SAIC didn’t show that NASA erred by excluding it from the competitive range by relying on differences in point scores and adjectival ratings in bids instead of the merits in the bids, the GAO said.
The record shows NASA’s contracting officer “was fully aware of and compared the proposals against one another on a qualitative basis for each evaluation criterion,” the GAO said.
The record ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.